Skip to content

What It Means To Be Human Essays

What Does It Mean To Be Human?

"I'm only Human," is a response everyone hears when someone makes a mistake. Does that mean humans are in heritably fallible? Or are we fallible because of society? In Mexico it is polite to greet someone by kissing them on the cheek, in the United States it is considered an invasion of personal space. Personal traits make up society, nevertheless there are characteristics that is common throughout all of our species. People's identity is formed through their moral behavior and conscience, making them human.For centuries humans functioned by morals and conscience, but in today's society we have a social order. The government and those in power help formulate our opinions and are utilized to keep us in check. The fundamental aspect of humans is morality and their relationship in society due to their interaction based on conscience efforts to keep order.
Many philosophers and psychologist from Jean Piaget to William James have theorized what makes a person who they are, their identity. Jean Piaget believed that the identity is formed in the sensorimotor stage and the preoperational stage. This means that a child is forming his identity as late to the age of seven (Schellenberg, 29) However, identity is strongly impacted by society such as school, church, government,and other institutions. Through our interactions with different situations our personality develops (Schellenberg 34). "In most situations there is a more diversified opportunity for the development of social identities, reflecting what the individual wants to put forth to define the self as well as what others want to accept,"(Schellenberg 35). Therefore, humans, much like animals, adapt to different situations based on who they are with. Individuals are always changing much like society when nurture comes into effect.
Various theories have been raised on whether or not morality is something someone is born with or acquired.  Sigmund Freud is considered one of the giants of psychology. Freud hypothesized since the early days of humanity the son has always envied his father, and coveted his mother. He believes the father is in a constant rivalry with his son, this is called the Oedipus complex. Freud believes this is the root of our morality, "Freud view was that adult morality is built around a sense of guilt, and that this guilt is in turn the product of the Oedipal situation," (Schellenberg, 47). The suppression of sexual impulses help children create a set of prohibitions named the superego. Freud believed that everyone has three psychological components: id, ego, and superego. The id and superego are always at odds with each other. The id represents the primal part in our human behavior but it is restrained by the superego. Freud believes that we our original identity is rooted in the id and it is shaped later by the superego to become the ego.
Psychologists have different theories on morality, however the best theory of moral development comes from Lawrence Kholberg. Kholberg...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

what does it mean to be an american

568 words - 2 pages "What does it mean to be an American?" The colorful explosion of fireworks on a dark cool night on the 4th of July is a sight I imagine every American should see. The National Anthem being sung by Carrie Underwood before the World Series at Wrigley field is a sound that every American should here. As an...

Geriatrics: What Does It Mean To Be an Adult?

2227 words - 9 pages Geriatrics is a pervasive topic. It is a medicinal process that comes to execution with age. It is mainly an aggregate of family medicine and a sizeable percentage of internal medicine (Stone, 2011). The main focus of the specialty is to prevent, if not treat, the older, aging adults that are sick or disabled due to the conditions that come with age. A major characteristic is that the age of one to necessitate geriatrics is not limited. However,...

What does it mean to be a citizen?

1923 words - 8 pages 1. What does it mean to be a citizen?The term "Citizen" is defined in the compact Macquarie Dictionary as, "a member, native or naturalised, of state or nation". This paper intends to question what it is that constitutes a member or citizen, of state or nation. Many concepts and theories are promoted by political theorists and practitioners alike that are varied...

What Does It Mean to Be Well Educated?

830 words - 3 pages To opinionate or to be opinionated as defined by Webster means to have an unduly adhering to one's own opinion or to preconceived notions. In “laymen’s terms“ basically it is to strongly stick to one’s own point of view. If education is so vast than how can someone be “well” at it? ~Kohn reveals that his wife who is a physician is hesitant at times reciting multiplication. This does not mean she is uneducated when indeed she may be responsible...

What Does It Mean to Be a Single Parent?

2034 words - 8 pages What does it mean to be a single parent? Many have his or her own opinion about what it means to be a single parent, but being a single parent means that it is now the job of one parent to be both mother and father to their children. Many debate on how children in single parent homes are affected. Some believe that children in single parent households are more at risk than children in a two parent households, but that outcome may vary...

McDonalds, what does it mean to you?

574 words - 2 pages Marketing Management 3-4:30 Current Issues Paper McDonald’s, What Does It Mean to You?      McDonald’s Corporation has held a prominent position in the fast-food market for much of its existence. A person would be hard pressed to find consumers who would not readily recognize the famous golden arches, as the company has expanded its market globally. However, as global consumer tastes shift to a more heath-conscious...

What drove Eliza to change? What does it mean to be high class?

1499 words - 6 pages In George Bernard Shaw’s didactic, Victorian play Pygmalion, Linguistics Professor Henry Higgins’s perceptive ears are offended by the sound of Eliza’s lowly, Cockney accent, so he wishes to change it into a flawless, pleasant voice that would blend in among high society. Higgins is a sarcastic and rude character who treats Eliza badly throughout most of the play, sometimes not even acknowledging her presence. This brings up the question of why...

"What Does It Mean To Be A Morally Responsible Teacher In A Social And Political Society"

555 words - 2 pages "WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A MORALLY RESPONSIBLETEACHER IN A SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DEMOCRACY?" Through my entire life I have always enjoyed History. While attending high school my interest for history grew dramatically after taking such classes like American and World...

What does it mean to be poor? Why should we care about poverty?

2466 words - 10 pages INTS100 MAJOR ESSAYWHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE POOR? WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT POVERTY?The notion of what it means to be poor cannot easily be defined and is to some extent subjective. One's definition varies, and as is often dependent on the social, cultural and political experience of the individual or the greater society can be contrastingly diverse. Research shows there appear to be extremes for both poverty and poor. To be poor...

The Davidic Monarchy: What does it mean to us?

2036 words - 8 pages PAGE 5 The Davidic Monarchy: What does it mean to us?History and Literature of Ancient IsraelHIS 111-CD21Katrina KrallProfessor RagsdaleSeptember 24, 2006According to author Ray C. Stedman (1997), David came in to power rather unexpectedly, as he "began with a few sheep-and suddenly…God exalted him and made him King over Israel, a man of extraordinary...

What does God mean to me

818 words - 3 pages James Michaels Benson Lower SixthWhat does God mean to me?I never went to church as a child although I have always thought that there was something that has control over the earth, a higher power as such. Before I attended Wellington I didn't really give the idea much thought and didn't really have a view on the situation. However over the last few years I have attended...

What does it mean to be human? Or, putting the point a bit more precisely, what are we saying about others when we describe them as human? Answering this question is not as straightforward as it might appear. Minimally to be human is to be one of us, but this begs the question of the class of creatures to which “us” refers.

Can’t we turn to science for an answer? Not really. Some paleoanthropologists identify the category of the human with the species Homo sapiens, others equate it with the whole genus Homo, some restrict it to the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, and a few take it to encompass the entire hominin lineage. These differences of opinion are not due to a scarcity of evidence. They are due to the complete absence of evidence − or, to put the point with greater clarity, the absence of any conception of what sort of evidence can settle the question of which group or groups of primates should be counted as human. Biologists aren’t equipped to tell us whether an organism is a human organism because “human” is a folk-category rather a scientific one. 

Some folk-categories correspond more or less precisely to scientific categories. To use a well-worn example, the folk-category “water” is coextensive with the scientific category “H2O”. In the philosophical jargon, water is said to be reducible to H2O, which means that H2O is nothing over and above water, and therefore any statement that is true of water is also true of H2O. But not every folk category is even approximately reducible to a scientific one. Consider the category “weed.” Weeds don’t have any biological properties that distinguish them from non-weeds. In fact, one could know everything there is to know biologically about a plant, but still not know that it is a weed. So, at least in this respect, being human is more like being a weed than it is like being water.  

If this sounds strange to you, it is probably because you are already committed to one or another conception of the human (for example, that all and only members of Homo sapiens are human). However, claims like “an animal is human only if it is a member of the species Homo sapiens” are stipulated rather than discovered. In deciding that all and only Homo sapiens are humans, one is expressing a preference about where the boundary separating humans from non-humans should be drawn, rather than discovering where such a boundary lays.  

If science can’t give us an account of the human, why not turn to the folk for an answer?  

Unfortunately, this strategy multiplies the problem rather than resolving it. When we look at how ordinary people have used the term “human” and its equivalents across cultures and throughout the span of history, we discover that often (maybe even typically) members of our species are explicitly excluded from the category of the human. It’s well-known that the Nazis considered Jews to be non-human creatures (Untermenschen), and somewhat less well-known that fifteenth century Spanish colonists took a similar stance towards the indigenous inhabitants of the Caribbean islands, as did North Americans toward enslaved Africans (my 2011 book Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others, gives many more examples). Another example is provided by the seemingly interminable debate about the moral permissibility of abortion, which almost always turns on the question of whether the embryo is a human being. 

At this point, it looks like the concept of the human is hopelessly confused. But looked at in the right way, it’s possible to discern a deeper order in the seeming chaos. The picture only seems chaotic if one assumes that “human” is supposed to designate a certain taxonomic category across the board (‘in every possible world’ as philosophers like to say). But if we think of it as an indexical expression – a term that gets its content from the context in which it is uttered—a very different picture emerges. 

Paradigmatic indexical terms include words like “now,” “here,” and “I.” Most words name exactly the same thing, irrespective of when, where, and by whom they are uttered. For instance, when anyone anywhere correctly uses the expression ‘the Eiffel Tower,’ they are naming one and the same architectural structure. In contrast, the word “now” names the moment at which the word is uttered, the word “here” names the place where it is uttered, and the word “I” names the person uttering it. If I am right, the word “human” works in much the same way that these words do. When we describe others as human, we are saying that they are members of our own kind or, more precisely, members of our own natural kind.  

What’s a natural kind? The best way to wrap one’s mind around the notion of natural kinds is to contrast them with artificial kinds. Airplane pilots are an artificial kind, as are Red Sox fans and residents of New Jersey, because they only exist in virtue of human linguistic and social practices, whereas natural kinds (for example, chemical elements and compounds, microphysical particles, and, more controversially, biological species) exist ‘out there’ in the world. Our concepts of natural are concepts that purport to correspond to the structural-fault-lines of a mind-independent world. In Plato’s vivid metaphor, they ‘cut nature at its joints.’ Weeds are an artificial kind, because they exist only in virtue of certain linguistic conventions and social practices, but pteridophyta (ferns) are a natural kind because, unlike weeds, their existence is insensitive to our linguistic conventions.

Philosophers distinguish the linguistic meaning of indexical expressions from their content. The content of an indexical is whatever it names. For example, if you were to say ‘I am here’, the word ‘here’ names the spot where you are sitting. Its linguistic meaning is ‘the place where I am when I utter the word “here”.’ If  ‘human’ means ‘my own natural kind,’ then referring to a being as human boils down to the assertion that the other is a member of the natural kind that the speaker believes herself to be. This goes a long way towards explaining why a statement of the form ‘x is human,’ in the mouth of a biologist might mean ‘x is a member of the species Homo sapiens’ while the very same statement in the mouth of a Nazi might mean ‘x is a member of the Aryan race.’ That's what it means to be human.